Home / Defense Strategy Advisory / Twenty questions (and expert answers) about the negotiations to end Russia’s war in Ukraine

Twenty questions (and expert answers) about the negotiations to end Russia’s war in Ukraine

European Centre for Strategic Studies and Policy (ECSAP)

Executive Summary (Key Judgments)

  • Battlefield: Russia continues slow, costly gains on select axes (notably toward Pokrovsk) without decisive breakthroughs. Ukraine’s long-range drone campaign is degrading Russian oil infrastructure, logistics, rail, and depots; the Black Sea Fleet is pushed east and largely restricted to standoff strikes while Ukrainian ports remain open.
  • Diplomacy: No credible public evidence of a substantive Russian shift; large-scale strikes on cities continue. A cease-fire remains distant.
  • Inside Russia: Escalating repression and suspicious elite deaths; an estimated ~1.3 million skilled Russians have left, creating long-term structural costs.
  • Russian economy: Short-term “resilience” masks structural fragilities—high inflation/interest rates, under-investment, rising deficits, and dependence on oil revenue.
  • Ukraine’s economy: Weak growth, high inflation, labor constraints from displacement and mobilization; aid sustains basic stability but cannot unlock dynamic growth without de-escalation.
  • Ukrainian public mood: Broad fatigue and desire for peace, yet strong rejection of any formal territorial concessions to Russia.
  • Moscow’s terms: Demands the entirety of Luhansk and Donetsk (including Sloviansk/Kramatorsk/Pokrovsk); Kyiv and European partners reject.
  • Security guarantees: NATO membership is unlikely soon; proposals for “Article-5-like” guarantees hinge on sustained arms flows, defense industrial cooperation, and limited European deployments in Ukraine—yet European readiness is constrained without a credible US backstop.
  • China factor: Beijing does not want Russia to lose; continues dual-use support for Russia’s defense base while hedging for a post-war, possibly post-Putin, future.
  • Accountability & rights: The forcible transfer of Ukrainian children is a core obstacle to any credible settlement; international accountability advances slowly amid legal/logistical hurdles.

Military Situation

  • Land: Incremental Russian advances at high cost; no decisive operational collapse on the Ukrainian side.
  • Air/Deep Strikes: Ukrainian drones increasingly disrupt Russian energy/logistics, amplifying economic pressure.
  • Maritime: Russia’s Black Sea Fleet freedom of maneuver is reduced; Ukrainian export corridors remain active.

Diplomacy

  • No verified change in Russia’s negotiating position; heavy strikes (e.g., late-August barrages) undercut claims of flexibility.
  • A Putin–Zelenskyy meeting remains unlikely in the near term; Moscow leverages time to bank incremental gains and shift blame.

Russia: Domestic Landscape

  • Intensified repression, criminalization of dissent, exile of independent media.
  • Brain drain erodes innovation capacity and medium-term growth potential.

Russia’s Economy

  • War spending up; deficit >~2% of GDP, ongoing drawdown of the National Welfare Fund.
  • Inflation and tight monetary policy restrain investment; oil revenues remain the critical lifeline—creating a sanctions pressure point.

Ukraine’s Economy

  • Slowing growth, double-digit inflation, currency pressure, and constrained productive capacity.
  • Western support preserves macro-stability but cannot drive high-growth recovery until violence abates.

Security Guarantees

  • Best-case (theoretical): NATO membership (not imminent).
  • Interim model: Legally backed “Article-5-like” guarantees: sustained weapons flows, joint defense-industrial projects, in-country European deployments for air defense/ISR/logistics/training; US air/naval backstop from neighboring NATO territory.
  • Gap: European hesitation and limited deployable mass without a credible US umbrella.

NATO & EU Tracks

  • NATO: “Irreversible path” politically affirmed; invitation contingent on consensus and conditions—no near-term accession.
  • EU: Real reform progress under fire; political spoilers remain, and enlargement raises structural questions (single market, CAP, decision-making reforms).

Economic Tools & Sanctions

  • Priority lever: Russian oil (tighter price cap enforcement, secondary sanctions on shippers/insurers/brokers, choke “shadow fleet”).
  • Frozen Russian assets: Use windfall proceeds to fund air defense and urgent reconstruction.
  • Scale up European defense production and lift strike-range constraints under coordinated frameworks.

Human Rights & Accountability

  • Deported children: Central moral and strategic issue; low return rate to date; ICC warrants exist but enforcement is limited.
  • Justice: Multiple venues (ICC, domestic courts, prospective special tribunal), but immunities/logistics slow progress; accountability must be integrated into any settlement architecture.

China

  • Rhetorical and material backing to Russia’s defense industry (dual-use flows), while quietly institutionalizing tieswith Russian elites for multiple post-war contingencies.

Baltic Perspective

  • Diplomacy without coercive pressure is counterproductive; Moscow uses talks to buy time, rearm, and press for concessions. Only rising costs can incentivize genuine compromise.

Scenarios (6–12 Months)

  1. Attritional status quo (Baseline): Slow Russian gains; expanding Ukrainian deep-strike tempo; rising but manageable strain on Russia’s economy.
  2. Sanctions escalation + AD surge: Tighter oil sanctions + surge in Ukrainian air defense reduce Russian strike payoff, enabling Ukrainian economic stabilization.
  3. Support erosion: Delivery lags and political fatigue erode Ukraine’s defensive capacity, pushing toward a suboptimal settlement.
  4. Limited geographic cease-fire: Frozen lines with ongoing long-range strikes; unresolved dossiers (children, accountability) persist.

Indicators to Watch (Early Warning/Opportunity)

  • Russian oil export volumes and net budget intake (monthly).
  • Frequency/range of Ukrainian drone strikes on energy, bridges, and rail.
  • Ukraine’s air-defense stockpiles and European/US delivery cadence.
  • Concrete moves toward European deployments inside Ukraine (AD/ISR/training).
  • Ukrainian public sentiment on elections, anti-corruption, and reforms.
  • Strike intensity vs. operational payoff for Russia.
  • Shifts in China’s dual-use export posture.

Policy Recommendations (ECSAP)

For the European Union and European States

  1. Air-Defense Surge Now: Accelerate transfer of Patriot/SAMP-T and interceptors; institute a rotating European AD coverage plan.
  2. Joint Defense Production: Multi-year emergency contracts for munitions and UAVs; financing/guarantees to crowd-in industry.
  3. Smart Oil Pressure: Tighten price cap enforcement and secondary sanctions; target shipping, insurers, flags, and brokers sustaining the shadow fleet.
  4. Frozen Assets Utilization: Channel windfall proceeds to procure AD systems and fund urgent reconstruction.
  5. Limited In-Country Deployment: European AD/ISR/logistics/training units inside Ukraine under clear rules and close US coordination.
  6. Child Repatriation Mechanism: EU-led tracing, sanctions on responsible individuals/entities, and integration into any talks as a non-negotiable benchmark.
  7. EU Pathway: Maintain reform momentum, manage spoilers via incentives/penalties, and set a conditional timeline.

For the United States and Transatlantic Partners

  1. Credible Umbrella: A joint statement specifying measurable “Article-5-like” elements (delivery rates, coverage levels, deployment footprints).
  2. Lend-Lease/Innovative Finance: Loan arrangements with European backstops to sustain US kit flows without depleting critical stockpiles.
  3. Oil Sanctions Escalation: Time-bound, enforceable measures to generate negotiating leverage while coordinating market stability.
  4. Lead on Children: Tie any diplomatic track to verifiable milestones in child returns.
  5. Accountability: Resource ICC/other mechanisms while safeguarding space for negotiated outcomes that don’t immunize future crimes.

Related content